Why the modulation input of Scalar must be a square wave?

Spooky is supporting a Russian study on the resonance effects of frequencies generated using electromagnetic, scalar, and distant quantum wave (spinor), in vivo cancer cellular treatment. The first phase of the study spanned 3 months; from the beginning of September till the end of November 2018.
Below are parts of the study results pertaining to Spooky Scalar. Note that Spooky Scalar inhibited the growth of cancer cells in all the tests:
The aim of the studies was to establish once and for all if it is possible to kill any cancer cell using predetermined resonant frequency/energy waves.
When using the (Spooky) Scalar device, a plastic container with cancer cells was placed in between the receiver (R) and the transmitter (T) on a flat non-conductive surface. The distance between (R) and (T) was approx. 6 feet. The testing was done at room temperature.
All tests were done with CO2 incubated controls.

1. Scalar device. We have tried an effect of methotrexate (2 uM) treated (MT) colon cancer cells signal on a colon cancer control sample located between the Scalar (R) and (T). The (MT) sample was placed on the (R) that was synchronized with the (T) at room temperature. After 40 hours of Scalar effect and additional CO2 incubation the inhibition effect was about 19%.
2. Scalar device. The same Scalar device used method as in #1 but with the cancer cells treated at room temperature with a higher dose of methotrexate (5 uM) showed after 16 hours, 28% inhibition effect in the sample located between the (R) and the (T).
3. Scalar device. A colon cancer sample treated with 20% alcohol was placed on the (R) at room temperature. The control cancer cells sample between the (R) and (T) showed 36% inhibition rate after 72 hours.
4. Scalar device. A colon cancer cell sample was treated with 0.3 mg/ml of NaN3 (nitrite-poison) was placed on the (R). The control cancer cells sample between (R) and (T) showed 21% inhibition rate after 45 hours of scalar exposure.
5. Scalar device. A leukemia cell treated with NaN3 (0.32 mg/ml) was incubated on Receiver (R) at room temperature. The control cancer cells sample between (R) and (T) showed 60% inhibition rate after 20 hours of scalar exposure.
6. Scalar device. We tried to establish what would be the effect of the scalar field by itself on leukemia cancer cells. Culture. The (R) and the (T) were synchronized (approx. 6 feet distance between) and the cancer cells sample was placed in between. There was 50% inhibition rate in the treated sample after 18 hours of the scalar field only exposure.

I believe that a square wave is most commonly generated by electronically clipping (limiting) the amplitude of a sine wave or other wave shape. The accuracy issue is in the pitch of the synthetic square wave as it approaches amplitude peaks, and can be reduced by clipping at a lower amplitude and earlier in the sine wave’s cycle to steepen the pitch as it approaches peaks. A perfect square wave would have 90° angles at the corners and may not be possible to generate. This change will also alter the duration of the powered parts of the synthetic “square wave”, but there are probably ways to electronically adjust the duration to what is wanted.

The mathematically perfect square wave would be a synthesis of an infinite series of sine waves of many (or all) frequencies of particular amplitudes such that their combination is a square wave with perfectly sharp corners. This may be practically unobtainable. But the really sharp rise times approaching amplitude peaks in the clipped synthetic square wave may be just as effective in the application, or made to be by lowering the amplitude where the original sine wave is clipped.

From my limited knowledge base, this fidelity aspect looks like a non-issue, as the synthetic square wave can be simply adjusted to faster rise times in the circuitry design. It does seem intuitively correct that faster rise times in the synthetic square wave would have a more potent “killing” effect.

I would appreciate hearing about any inaccuracies in my conjectures above. Thank you all for all that you do.

For more details, please check this link:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/spooky2scalar/posts/395087584398139/